Kolkata bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently held that interest income earned from nationalized banks shall be treated as business income for which deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act can be claimed.
M/s. DSL Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) In the present case, the rents are received on a property purchased for setting up of the project and is inextricably linked to the completion of the project. Considering the fact that the assessee had taken steps to evict tenants and also paid compensation to them while getting vacant […]
We have recently created a poll in which we asked our readers Do you think GST Council should provide option to Revise Form GSTR-3B? In Response to our poll we got 1165 votes, 88 Replies, 35 Likes and 38 Retweets. Out of total votes 94% of Taxpayers / Tax Professionals in India votes in favour of Option to Revise Form GSTR-3B.
Recently CA fraternity has been allegedly criticized by a Pr. CIT from Pune and this made me think whether we Chartered Accountants (CAs) have become a Punching Bag in India? Can we be held responsible for any wrong-doing in India? If any Government implemented policy fails, we CAs are held responsible for its failure. Demonetization […]
CBEC issued 17 more Notification/ Circulars or Orders on 15th November 2017 to give effect to various decisions taken by it in 23rd GST Council meeting and to clarify Procedure for Manual filing & processing of GST refund claims, Apportionment of IGST with respect to advertisement services,GST on warehousing of agricultural produce, General Insurance & […]
Hyderabad bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that if the AO was satisfied with the original assessment then the re-assessment order under section 147/ 148 of the Income Tax Act passed only on the direction of the superior officers is invalid.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata bench recently ordered that the penalty u/s 271C of the Income Tax Act cannot be levied for the delayed deduction of TDS amount.
The fact that the assessee had given his personal property as collateral security for enabling M/s. Palsons Drugs Pvt. Ltd to obtain loan and other credit facilities is not in dispute. Under the circumstances the proposition of law as laid down by the Jurisdictional High Court in the case of ‘Pradip Kumar Malhotra vs CIT’ (supra) squarely applies to the facts of the case.
Penalty u/s. 271B is attracted for failure to get accounts audited u/s. 44AB. Even though the law prescribes the levy of penalty, in case of default, the same is not automatic as provisions of Section 273B gives relief, when there is a reasonable cause.
CBEC has issued 22 Notifications related to IGST, CGST, and UTGST dated: 14/11/2017 which are effective from 15th November 2017 on the Midnight of 14th November 2017 as per its tradition of doing everything last minute. Notifications were hosted on CBEC websites around 23.15 or after on 14th November or on 15th November. So CBEC issues notification […]
