Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : P.D. Usha Rani Vs. The Income Tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2011- 12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

P.D. Usha Rani Vs. ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Penalty u/s. 271B is attracted for failure to get accounts audited u/s. 44AB. Even though the law prescribes the levy of penalty, in case of default, the same is not automatic as provisions of Section 273B gives relief, when there is a reasonable cause. The AO has to examine the same as per the provisions. In these cases, the turnover has increased marginally over the lower limit of Rs. 40 Lakhs prescribed u/s. 44AB for the first time during the year. Even though assessees are on the record of

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930