Case Law Details
Case Name : P.D. Usha Rani Vs. The Income Tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2011- 12
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Hyderabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
P.D. Usha Rani Vs. ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Penalty u/s. 271B is attracted for failure to get accounts audited u/s. 44AB. Even though the law prescribes the levy of penalty, in case of default, the same is not automatic as provisions of Section 273B gives relief, when there is a reasonable cause. The AO has to examine the same as per the provisions. In these cases, the turnover has increased marginally over the lower limit of Rs. 40 Lakhs prescribed u/s. 44AB for the first time during the year. Even though assessees are on the record of
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.