Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : P.D. Usha Rani Vs. The Income Tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2011- 12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
P.D. Usha Rani Vs. ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Penalty u/s. 271B is attracted for failure to get accounts audited u/s. 44AB. Even though the law prescribes the levy of penalty, in case of default, the same is not automatic as provisions of Section 273B gives relief, when there is a reasonable cause. The AO has to examine the same as per the provisions. In these cases, the turnover has increased marginally over the lower limit of Rs. 40 Lakhs prescribed u/s. 44AB for the first time during the year. Even though assessees are on the record of department in earlier years, there is no need to get the book...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930