Case Law Details
Case Name : P.D. Usha Rani Vs. The Income Tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2011- 12
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Hyderabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
P.D. Usha Rani Vs. ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Penalty u/s. 271B is attracted for failure to get accounts audited u/s. 44AB. Even though the law prescribes the levy of penalty, in case of default, the same is not automatic as provisions of Section 273B gives relief, when there is a reasonable cause. The AO has to examine the same as per the provisions. In these cases, the turnover has increased marginally over the lower limit of Rs. 40 Lakhs prescribed u/s. 44AB for the first time during the year. Even though assessees are on the record of department in earlier years, there is no need to get the book...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


