ITAT Pune held that interest income on enhanced compensation is contingent and hence not taxable under section 56(2)(viii) of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed and order set aside.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition towards unexplained stock cannot be sustained merely relying on the statement without any corroborative evidence. Accordingly, addition set aside and appeal allowed.
Delhi High Court held that detention of gold/jewellery is held to be impermissible since show cause notice has not been issued post detention. Accordingly, petition disposed of and detained jewellery directed to be released.
ITAT Surat held that reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act without tangible material tantamount to change of opinion on the existing facts and the same is impermissible in law. Accordingly, appeal allowed and reopening quashed.
NCLAT Delhi held that dismissal of section 9 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code upheld a case of pre-existing dispute arises out of termination of contract. Accordingly, appeal rejected and order of adjudicating authority upheld.
The application for approval under section 80G, though filed simultaneously, was rejected without any separate adjudication. The CIT(E) summarily disposed of the 80G application along with the 12AB rejection, without recording any satisfaction or finding in terms of section 80G(5).
ITAT Chandigarh held that addition towards bogus Long Term Capital Gain u/s. 153A of the Income Tax Act cannot be sustained in the absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search. Accordingly, appeal allowed and addition deleted.
ITAT Chennai held that deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act is admissible to Regional Rural Banks. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed and order of CIT(A) upheld.
CESTAT Bangalore held that State Cricket Association rendering services to their members cannot be leviable to service under ‘Club or Association Services’. Accordingly, demand confirmed on this count is set aside.
ITAT Kolkata held that Foreign Tax Credit cannot be denied for delayed filing of Form No. 67 since the provision of DTAA override the provision of Section 90 of the Act and also filing it is directory requirement and not mandatory requirement. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
