In the case of Shri Thomas George Muthoot vs The Commissioner of Income Tax High court has held that TDS if to be deducted by individual who required to get his accounts audited. A statutory provision
I would like would like to give some guidance on CA final Cost Paper based on my experience. Some students have been made a concept that Cost is all about Standard Costing, Transfer Pricing and relevant costing.
In the case ITO Vs. M/s. Nupur Carpets Pvt. Ltd. the Hon’ble Kolkata ITAT held by converting the stock-n-trade into investment, it does not alter the character, nature and intention of that particular transaction especially in the context of capital gain versus business income.
In the case DCIT Vs. Maithan Smelters Ltd. the Hon’ble Kolkata ITAT held that the interest subsidy, transport subsidy and power subsidy received by the assessee are eligible for deduction u/s 80IB of the Act.
The Assessee had paid a sum of Rs.9,22,160/- on account of Sewing and Processing Charges without deducting TDS on the same. The AO invoked the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act and disallowed the entire amount paid on account of Sewing and Processing Charges.
The Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad has today convicted Sri A.Mallikarjuna Rao, (IRS-2001), then Assistant Director of Income Tax (Recovery), New Delhi in a Disproportionate Assets case and sentenced him to undergo five years Rigorous Imprisonment with fine for Rs.Six lakhs. The said accused is presently posted as Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (DCIT) in the Office of CCIT
Government has extended the due date for filing of Income Tax Return for Assessment Year 2015-16 to 7th September 2015 from 31st August 2015 for taxpayers who were required to file their tax-return by 31st July, 2015. It has been done considering hardships faced by taxpayer in E-Filing Returns of Income on the last date i.e. […]
In the case Manoj Garg Vs. ITO the Hon’ble Kolkata ITAT held that both Central Excise Refund and Sales Tax Remission are eligible deductions u/s 80IC and that the CIT was not justified in initiating proceedings u/s 263 of the Act
In the case Shri B L Dasraj Urs Vs. ITO the Hon’ble Bangalore ITAT held that show cause notice u/s 274 is defective if it does not spell out the grounds on which penalty is sought to be imposed.
In the case ITO Vs. Smt. Mala Gupta the Hon’ble Kolkata ITAT held that slight difference in the name of the person does not mean that it is not the same person provided the genuineness of the transaction is proved.
