Notification No.95/2015 – Customs (N.T.) In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise & Customs hereby makes the following amendments in the Notification of the Central Board of Excise and Customs No. 93/2015-CUSTOMS (N.T.) dated the 17th September, 2015, with effect from 30th September, 2015, namely:-
A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No.17 In order to facilitate Rupee denominated borrowing from overseas, it has been decided to put in place a framework for issuance of Rupee denominated bonds overseas within the overarching ECB policy. The broad contours of the framework are as follows:
Managerial Persons covered are Managing Director, Whole-time Director, Part time Directors and managers who shall be paid remuneration subject to and in accordance with provisions of Section 197 of the Companies Act, 2013. As compared to various sections and chapters viz section 198, 309, etc of Companies Act, 1956 which deals with Managerial remunerations separately, the new Act […]
No.1/20/2014 -MC/288 With reference to the above mentioned subject, it is stated that the Public Accounts Committee (16th Lok Sabha) have recommended vide Para No.16 of Report No, 20 that Ministry expedite the implementation of their Standing Audit Cammittee (SAC) recommendation to have action initiated against officers responsible for serious lapses in furnishing remedial/corrective ATNs on Audit paras. The Committee, further reiterating its earlier recommendation, desire that a system of fixing responsibility for serious lapses be put in place by all Ministries.
ITAT Ahmedabad has held in the case ITO v Someshwar Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. that the TDS would be deducted u/s 194C only when the amount of single contract exceeds Rs. 20,000 or the amount exceeds Rs. 50,000 in aggregate which has been given to a particular person in a year.
In the case of Flevel International V/S Commissioner Of Central Excise, it was held by Delhi High Court that the denial of an opportunity of cross-examination of a witness whose statements have been relied upon in the adjudication order would vitiate the order of adjudication. In the present case
In the case of Commissioner of Customs vs. M/s. Seiko Brushware India , it was held by Supreme Court that benefit of exemption Notification No. 34/98-Cus. Dated 13.06.1998 for NIL SAD is not granted in respect of such goods which the importer sells post importation from a place located in an area where no tax is chargeable on sale of goods.
In the case of M/s. Rupa & Co. Limited Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise, it was held that what is contained in finished product is only a quantity of all the inputs of the same weight as that of the finished product
ITAT Chandigarh held In the case of DCIT vs. M/s Indo Soviet Friendship that the Assessing Officer has not brought any material on record as to how he has given his finding that the cars have been purchased for the benefit of the Chairman.
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley Formalizes Merger of Forward Markets Commission (FMC) with SEBI; FM: Amalgamation of FMC And SEBI would bring Convergence of Regulations in the Commodities and Equity Derivatives Markets; FM: Markets Thrive where there is Confidence and Integrity and the Regulator must ensure that Manipulative Activities are Curbed in Derivatives Market
