GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI DEPARTMENT OF TRADE & TAXES VYAPAR BHAWAN: I.P. ESTATE: NEW DELHI -110 002 No.F.7(433)/Policy-II/VAT/2012/PF/1259-70 Dated 08/01/2016 NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (2) of Section 61 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 read with sub-rule (1) of Rule 43 of the DVAT Rules; […]
Council of the ICAI is pleased to notify for general information the names (in alphabetical order), membership numbers and places of the members, who have been elected to the Twenty Third Council of the Institute from the constituencies as given below:-
The facility of auto-downloading of the forms shall not be available to the dealer for the tax period in cases in which the ratio of sale to purchase, including stock transfer and local transactions, falls below 45%. The statutory forms in such cases shall be available for auto-downloading on the basis of sale and purchase of next quarter
Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India is pleased to notify for general information the names (in alphabetical order), membership numbers and places of the members, who have been elected to the Twenty Second Regional Councils of the Institute as given below:-
As per paragraph 38(1) of the EPF Scheme, 1952, paragraph 3 of EPS, 1995 and paragraph 8(1) of EDLI Scheme, 1976, the employers are required to pay the contributions and administrative charges within fifteen days of dose of every month. The employer, as per para 5.1.3 of Manual of Accounting Procedure (Part-I General), is also allowed a grace period of 5 days to remit the contribution.
Delhi High Court held In the case of Honey Enterprises. vs. CIT that the Assessee has sought to club the two expenses, that is, the cost of acquisition of distribution rights of films and the cost of prints for the purposes of charging the same against realizations from those films and for carrying forward the excess to the next year for the purposes of Rule 9B of the Rules.
Delhi High Court held In the case of Principle CIT vs. Matchless Glass Services Pvt. Ltd. that the fact that a common address is shared by several companies may not be a sole ground to doubt the identity or the creditworthiness of the companies
Delhi High Court held In the case of CIT vs. M/s Abhinandan Investment Ltd. that there is no necessity or occasion for trader to separately determine the cost of acquisition of each item of goods sold by him; he is only required to prepare a trading account while reflecting the aggregate sales and purchases.
Delhi High Court held In the case of Bausch & Lomb Eye care (India) Pvt. Ltd. that in the absence of any machinery provision, bringing an imagined transaction to tax is not possible. The decisions in CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty (1981) 128 ITR 294 (SC) and PNB Finance Ltd. v. CIT (2008) 307 ITR 75 (SC) make this position clears.
Delhi High Court held In the case of Principle CIT vs. Nikki Drugs & Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. that the Allahabad High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Gopi Apartments: (2014) 365 ITR 411 (All.) has held that even in cases where the assessing officer of the person searched and the assessee who is sought to be assessed under Section 153C is the same
