CESTAT Delhi held that Blower, Filter, Water Valve Assembly, Control Panel, Module JCBHP and Thermostat are classifiable under CTI 8414 59 30, CTI 8421 39 90, CTI 8481 10 90, CTI 8538 10 90 and CTI 9032 10 10 and cannot be reassessed as parts of air conditioner under CTI 8415 90 00. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
CESTAT Mumbai held that Chief Commissioner was not justified in rejecting the compounding application filed u/s. 137(3) of the Customs Act, 1962 without granting any opportunity of hearing since the same results into violation of principles of natural justice.
CESTAT Mumbai held that there is no provision/ stipulation that prohibits temporary retention of goods in non-bonded area while remedies were under way and, that too, with permission from customs authorities. Accordingly, redemption fine and penalties set aside.
Delhi High Court held that the used jewellery worn by the passenger would fall within the ambit of personal effects in terms of the Baggage Rules, 2016. Accordingly, the same would be exempt from detention by the Customs Department.
NCLAT Chennai held that delay of 26 days in filing of the report under Section 106 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by the Resolution Professional condoned as reasonable cause of non-submission of the repayment plan and relevant information by the Guarantor shown.
Gujarat High Court held that entire addition towards bogus purchases not justifiable accordingly, addition at the rate of 6% of the bogus purchases is fair and reasonable. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
NCLAT Delhi held that default occurred on 25th March 2023 which is well beyond the outer limit of section 10A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 which squarely brings the claim within the permissible scope of Section 7 of the IBC. Thus, admission of section 7 application justified.
NCLAT Chennai held that resolution professional is permitted to issue fresh Form G and to invite Expression of Interest (EoI) from new and interested eligible Prospective Resolution Applicants subject to the stipulations that the CIRP process has to be completed in a time bound manner.
Supreme Court held that entry tax u/s. 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976 [Madhya Pradesh Entry Tax Act] is leviable on sale of goods to State Warehouse. Accordingly, civil appeals are dismissed.
Calcutta High Court held that internal Comparable Uncontrolled Price [CUP] is most appropriate method in determining Arm’s Length Price [ALP] for sale of power by Captive Power Plant to non-eligible units of the assessee. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
