Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs PVR Inox Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

DCIT Vs PVR Inox Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)

The only issue in dispute was whether Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges paid by PVR Inox were subject to TDS u/s 194C or 194I. CIT(A) had held that CAM charges are contractual in nature and fall u/s 194C, not 194I.

The Tribunal noted that this very issue had already been decided in the assessee’s favour in its own earlier years (AYs 2011–12 & 2012–13), where the ITAT held:

  • Lease rentals are covered under Section 194I (rent).
  • CAM charges, being separate operational/maintenance services, fall under Section

    Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reassessment After 31-03-2024 Held Time-Barred; First Proviso to Sec. 149(1) Overrides 148A – Entire Proceedings Quashed by ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Quashes U/s 143(3) Assessment for Want of U/s 153C Jurisdiction ITAT Bangalore Deletes Section 271D Penalty on Cash Sale Receipt ITAT Bangalore Deletes Section 271FAA Penalty for SFT Delay Second OGE Non-Est; Two U/s 143(3) r.w.s. 254 Orders for Same AY Invalid – Revenue Appeals Dismissed by ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728