Case Law Details
Case Name : DCIT Vs PVR Inox Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs PVR Inox Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
The only issue in dispute was whether Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges paid by PVR Inox were subject to TDS u/s 194C or 194I. CIT(A) had held that CAM charges are contractual in nature and fall u/s 194C, not 194I.
The Tribunal noted that this very issue had already been decided in the assessee’s favour in its own earlier years (AYs 2011–12 & 2012–13), where the ITAT held:
- Lease rentals are covered under Section 194I (rent).
- CAM charges, being separate operational/maintenance services, fall under Section
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


