Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bommarabettu Madhusudhana Acharya Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bommarabettu Madhusudhana Acharya Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Penalty u/s 271D Deleted – Cash Received as Sale Consideration Not Loan/Deposit – Reasonable Cause & Bona Fide Transaction Covered u/s 273B – ITAT Bangalore In ITA No.937/Bang/2025, AY 2016-17, the assessee received ₹13,56,500 in cash from buyers towards sale of flats, which was treated by the Department as violation of Sec.269SS, leading to penalty u/s 271D equal to the amount received. The assessee contended that the cash represented balance sale consideration and was accepted due to insistence from buyers, who were temple...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930