Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bommarabettu Madhusudhana Acharya Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bommarabettu Madhusudhana Acharya Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Penalty u/s 271D Deleted – Cash Received as Sale Consideration Not Loan/Deposit – Reasonable Cause & Bona Fide Transaction Covered u/s 273B – ITAT Bangalore In ITA No.937/Bang/2025, AY 2016-17, the assessee received ₹13,56,500 in cash from buyers towards sale of flats, which was treated by the Department as violation of Sec.269SS, leading to penalty u/s 271D equal to the amount received. The assessee contended that the cash represented balance sale consideration and was accepted due to insistence from buyers, who were temple...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SCN u/s 74 GST Valid Even if Based on Material from Alleged Illegal Search: Karnataka HC Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: Karnataka HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void: Karnataka HC LTCG Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Property Settled by Husband – ITAT Deletes Rs. 19.86 Cr Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031