Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hamasamani Silks Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Hamasamani Silks Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)

No Defect in Books, No Section 68- When Books Are Clean, Additions Can’t Stand — ITAT Deletes Cash Deposit Addition- Audited Books Prevail — Cash Deposits Accepted as Genuine

Assessee, a silk saree trader, deposited cash during the year-including the demonetisation period-& AO added ₹40,32,500 u/s 68, treating it as unexplained, merely because cash deposits in AY 2017-18 exceeded those in AY 2016-17. Books were audited u/s 44AB, & 95% of sales were in cash, generating large cash balances duly reflected i

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reassessment After 31-03-2024 Held Time-Barred; First Proviso to Sec. 149(1) Overrides 148A – Entire Proceedings Quashed by ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Quashes U/s 143(3) Assessment for Want of U/s 153C Jurisdiction ITAT Bangalore Deletes Section 271D Penalty on Cash Sale Receipt ITAT Bangalore Deletes Section 271FAA Penalty for SFT Delay Second OGE Non-Est; Two U/s 143(3) r.w.s. 254 Orders for Same AY Invalid – Revenue Appeals Dismissed by ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728