This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Customs Must Refund Bank Guarantee Wrongly Encashed During Appeal: CESTAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Oswal Industries Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (Import) (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Oswal Industries Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (Import) (CESTAT Mumbai)
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, decided the appeal filed by Oswal Industries Limited against the Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai Zone-I concerning the encashment of a bank guarantee during the pendency of an appeal and the subsequent rejection of refund on the ground of limitation under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962.
The dispute centered on whether a bank guarantee encashed by the department during the pendency of appeal could be treated as “payment of duty” ...
