Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Parvatiben Gohil Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Parvatiben Gohil Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Assessee, was one of the 20 co-owners of a property situated in a rural area. The property was sold,  &  the total consideration for the entire land was ₹38,25,000/-. AO, however, treated the entire amount as short-term capital gain in Assessee’s hands, ignoring that she was only a fractional co-owner. Assessee contended that her actual share was only ₹1,77,000/-, being 1/20th of the sale value,  &  the land in question was rural agricultural land, which is not a “capital asset” u/s 2(14)(iii) . Assessee’s Argument The land sold...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Redeposit from Earlier Property Sale Accepted Entire Sales Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930