Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Parvatiben Gohil Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Parvatiben Gohil Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Assessee, was one of the 20 co-owners of a property situated in a rural area. The property was sold,  &  the total consideration for the entire land was ₹38,25,000/-. AO, however, treated the entire amount as short-term capital gain in Assessee’s hands, ignoring that she was only a fractional co-owner. Assessee contended that her actual share was only ₹1,77,000/-, being 1/20th of the sale value,  &  the land in question was rural agricultural land, which is not a “capital asset” u/s 2(14)(iii) . Assessee’s Argument The land sold...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930