Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Parvatiben Gohil Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Parvatiben Gohil Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Assessee, was one of the 20 co-owners of a property situated in a rural area. The property was sold,  &  the total consideration for the entire land was ₹38,25,000/-. AO, however, treated the entire amount as short-term capital gain in Assessee’s hands, ignoring that she was only a fractional co-owner. Assessee contended that her actual share was only ₹1,77,000/-, being 1/20th of the sale value,  &  the land in question was rural agricultural land, which is not a “capital asset” u/s 2(14)(iii) . Assessee’s Argument The land sold...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031