Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manubhai Keshavlal & Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manubhai Keshavlal &Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad: Reassessment Annulled as Notice u/s 148 Issued Beyond Surviving Limitation Period — Invalid under Rajeev Bansal & TOLA Framework Assessee, a partnership firm engaged in trading at Visnagar, filed its return for AY 2016-17. Later, AO reopened the assessment u/s 147, issuing a notice u/s 148, & added ₹3,71,367/- treating it as the value of a tour package received in the course of business, taxable as a benefit u/s 28(iv). The firm challenged not just the addition but the very validity of the reassessment, contending ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031