Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Priyesh Singhania Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Priyesh Singhania Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur) ITAT Restores 10(10D) Exemption -CPC Exceeded Powers – 143(1) Adjustment on Insurance Policy Quashed Assessee had taken a Reliance Life Insurance policy on 31.03.2011 with sum assured of Rs. 20,00,000/- & paid single premium of Rs. 5,00,000/-. On surrender in April 2016, he received Rs. 7,41,718/- on which TDS was deducted u/s 194DA. While processing return u/s 143(1), CPC added the maturity proceeds to total income, denying exemption u/s 10(10D). CIT(A) confirmed adjustment holding that premium exceeded 20% of sum assured, making exemption inapplic...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930