Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Surender Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Surender Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Sec.44AD Shield: Business Receipts in Bank Not Unexplained Cash Credits; Tribunal Deletes Addition on Cash Deposits – Already Counted in Presumptive Income Assessee had filed his return of income for AY 2012-13 under the presumptive taxation scheme u/s 44AD, declaring turnover of ₹21.42 lakh & income of ₹2.54 lakh (business profit ₹2.51 lakh). The case was reopened because Assessee had made cash deposits of ₹15.91 lakh in his bank account, which AO treated as unexplained & added back to income. Assessee explained that the deposits were noth...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930