Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anand Boddapaty Vs PCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-2022
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anand Boddapaty Vs PCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Unregistered Sale Agreement with Spouse Not Enough for Section 54F Exemption – Section 263 Revision Upheld: Capital Gain Exemption Denied on Unregistered Intra-Spouse Property Deal– ITAT Hyderabad Assessee had sold a property & claimed exemption u/s 54F by purchasing a duplex villa from his wife, Smt. Radha Kumari Boddapaty, for ₹4.40 crore. The transaction was based on an un-registered sale agreement with possession (15.05.2021) because the property was listed as “Prohibited Property” under Government of Telangana notifications, hence...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930