This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 40A(3) disallowance invalid as payments to single person per bill not exceeds Rs. 20,000
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Harishkumar Mathuradas Barai V.M. Barai & Co Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Rajkot
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Harishkumar Mathuradas Barai V.M. Barai & Co Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Rajkot has deleted an addition of ₹6,00,000 made by the tax authorities against Harishkumar Mathuradas Barai under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. The disallowance was made on the grounds that the assessee had made cash payments exceeding the statutory limit of ₹20,000 to a single party, V.M. Barai & Co., for the assessment year 2015-16.
The ITAT’s decision was based on a prior ruling by a co-ordinate bench in a group case, Parsottam Madhavji Bh...
Author Info
