Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Cuttack Quashes Penalty u/s 271D on Wrong AY Basis

Case Law Details

Case Name
Jogendra Kumar Panda Vs ITO (ITAT Cuttack)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement Jogendra Kumar Panda Vs ITO (ITAT Cuttack) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cuttack Bench, has allowed an appeal filed by Jogendra Kumar Panda, quashing a penalty of ₹39,20,000/- levied under Section 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The penalty, imposed for alleged violation of Section 269SS concerning cash transactions, was set aside due to being initiated for an incorrect assessment year. The assessee had sold immovable property for ₹39,20,000/- via a sale deed dated March 23, 2016, with the consideration received in cash. This transaction was relevant to Asses...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,682

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *