This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Late Return Filed after Sec 142(1) Notice Held Invalid; No 143(2) Notice Required When Return is Invalid
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Genius Money Changer Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Genius Money Changer Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Late Return Filed after Sec 142(1) Notice Held Invalid; No 143(2) Notice Required When Return is Invalid; ITAT Restores Sec 69A Addition to AO
The Tribunal ruled that a belated return filed beyond the statutory timeline in response to Section 142(1) is invalid, justifying best judgment assessment under Section 144. ITAT clarified that when a return filed is invalid under law, there is no requirement for notice under Section 143(2). The best judgment assessment under Section 144 was upheld, while addition of ₹52.34 under Section 69A w...





