This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Refund of Extra Duty Deposit should be provided automatically without requiring separate refund application
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Herrenknecht India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Herrenknecht India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Conclusion: Refund of Extra Duty Deposit ( EDD ) was not subject to the limitation under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, and should be returned upon finalization of provisional assessments without requiring a formal refund claim.
Held: Assessee-company imported Tunneling Boring Equipment and components through 31 Bills of Entry ( BOE ), which were provisionally assessed with the payment of EDD. It filed a refund claim for Rs. 26,79,183 towards EDD after the final assessment. The refund claim was rejected on grounds o...




