This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Deletes Addition for sufficiently explained Cash Deposit During Demonetization
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Nisha Jain (ITAT Jaipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Jaipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ACIT Vs Nisha Jain (ITAT Jaipur)
The case of ACIT Vs Nisha Jain, heard by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Jaipur, revolves around the addition of Rs. 72 lakh made by the Assessing Officer (AO) concerning cash deposits during the demonetization period. The Revenue challenged the deletion of this addition by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], arguing that incriminating material and statements recorded during the survey indicated these deposits as undisclosed income.
Background of the Case
During a survey conducted on M/s Quick Advertising Co, owned by Smt. Nisha Jain, di...
Author Info
