Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Saksham Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Saksham Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) AO made addition u/sec.40A(3) alleging that assessee had made cash purchases in a day of Rs.3,36,551/- from M/s.M M Pvt. Ltd. Assessee contended that they have  not made any purchases during the year from M/s.M M Pvt. Ltd.   Assessee had asked AO to provide copy of the information received by AO, on the basis of which notice u/s.148  was issued. Assrssee contended that till date, no such information has been provided and that the AO was not having any information and notice u/sec.148 is bad in law. CIT(A) confirmed that addition & on further appeal...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930