Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Saksham Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Saksham Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) AO made addition u/sec.40A(3) alleging that assessee had made cash purchases in a day of Rs.3,36,551/- from M/s.M M Pvt. Ltd. Assessee contended that they have  not made any purchases during the year from M/s.M M Pvt. Ltd.   Assessee had asked AO to provide copy of the information received by AO, on the basis of which notice u/s.148  was issued. Assrssee contended that till date, no such information has been provided and that the AO was not having any information and notice u/sec.148 is bad in law. CIT(A) confirmed that addition & on further appeal...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening on Change of Opinion Invalid: ITAT Quashes Entire Assessment CIT(A)’s Non-Speaking Order & Failure to Address Legal Ground- Matter Remanded Section 12AB Registration Cannot Be Denied for Missing Irrevocability Clause Alone: ITAT Follows Bombay HC Reassessment Time-Barred Despite TOLA & Ashish Agarwal: ITAT Upholds Quashing Registration Cannot Be Denied for Technical Defect: ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930