Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Saksham Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Saksham Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

AO made addition u/sec.40A(3) alleging that assessee had made cash purchases in a day of Rs.3,36,551/- from M/s.M M Pvt. Ltd. Assessee contended that they have  not made any purchases during the year from M/s.M M Pvt. Ltd.   Assessee had asked AO to provide copy of the information received by AO, on the basis of which notice u/s.148  was issued. Assrssee contended that till date, no such information has been provided and that the AO was not having any information and notice u/sec.148 is bad in law.

CIT(A) confirmed that addition &

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mere book entries & AIR data insufficient for additions: ITAT Mumbai Landmark SC Ruling on Property Transaction in Cash: Did It Quote Wrong Section? Section 263 Cannot Be Invoked Solely for Lack of DVO Report: Karnataka HC Audit Fee Allowable Only When Liability Crystallizes, Not on Estimates or Historical Basis One-Time Membership Fees as Capital Receipts for Coop Bank: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930