Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s Paramount Communications Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No.767/DEL/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/06/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

M/s Paramount Communications Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

Conclusion: Since  AS-11 was mandatory and required to be followed in computing the income, therefore, assessee was entitled to claim depreciation on forex loss pertained to non-depreciable asset acquired in India as loss from income.

Held: Assessee had issued unsecured foreign currency convertible bonds of US$ 2,70,00,000/-. The entire proceeds were utilized in AY 2007-08 & 2008-09. As on 31.03.2009, the liability was in Rupee terms Rs.138,21,30,000/- whereas on 31.03.2008 it was Rs.1,08,00,00,000/-. Thus, the amount of Rs.30,21,30,000/-was the difference between the two figures. Out of the forex loss of Rs.30,21,30,000/-, Rs.3,21,04,023/- and Rs.l,84,67,407/- were not claimed as a deduction. Rs.12,65,54,992/- was the amount which pertained to acquisition of indigenous fixed assets. This was added to the cost of the assets by assessee and depreciation was claimed on this amount and this depreciation was claimed as an expense in the P & L A/c. The amount of Rs.12,50,03,577/-was claimed as loss from income. This loss as per assessee pertained to non depreciable assets. AO disallowed the loss of Rs.12,50,03,577/- (proportionate to non-depreciable assets) claimed as deduction for the reason that the loss pertained to capital assets (land) and was required to be capitalized in the value of such asset. Since, asset acquired was not depreciable, therefore, loss could not be allowed. It was held that assessee had prepared its accounts as per AS-11 which deal with effect of changes in foreign exchange rate and such difference was required to be recognized as income or expenditure. Following the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v Woodward Governor India P. Ltd., where it was held that AS-11 was mandatory and required to be followed in computing the income and the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs Virtual Soft Systems Ltd., holding that it was the duty of the AO to follow accounting standards and following the rule of consistency, the foreign exchange loss of Rs.12,50,33,577/- should be allowed as revenue expenditure.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DELHI

ITA No.767/Del/2014 filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 11.11.2013 of the learned CIT(A)-XVII, New Delhi, relating to Assessment Year 2009-10. ITA No.1378/Del/2017 filed by the assessee and ITA No.2288/Del/2017 filed by the Revenue are cross appeal and are directed against the order dated 30.01.2017 of the learned CIT(A)-7, New Delhi, relating to the Assessment Year 2010-11. For the sake of convenience these were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031