This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 271D Penalty Quashed as Six-Month Limitation Expired: Bengaluru ITAT
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kodiambadi Subrahmanya Rai Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Kodiambadi Subrahmanya Rai Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Bengaluru ITAT Quashes Penalty U/s 271D as Time-Barred – Six-Month Limitation U/s 275(1)(c) Strictly Enforced
The Bengaluru ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeals for AYs 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2020-21 by quashing penalties imposed under Section 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as barred by limitation under Section 275(1)(c). The penalties arose from alleged violation of Section 269SS based on statements recorded under Section 132(4) during scrutiny proceedings in the case of another person, leading to notices issued ...






