This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Service Tax on Parent Company Cost Allocations as No Service Was Received: CESTAT Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Vs Dana India Pvt Ltd (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Vs Dana India Pvt Ltd (CESTAT Delhi)
CESTAT Deletes Service Tax Demand as Un-Invoiced Allocations Were Not Consideration for Services; Service Tax Demand Quashed Because Internal Cost Sharing Is Not Taxable Service; CESTAT Rules Debit Entries in Parent Company Books Cannot Trigger Service Tax Liability; No Reverse Charge Liability on Un-Invoiced Allocations Because No Consideration Was Agreed.
In Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Vs Dana India Private Ltd, the Revenue challenged an Order-in-Appeal that had dropped the demand of...




