This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Difference Between Projected & Actual Revenue Cannot Invalidate DCF Valuation: ITAT Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Cinestaan Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Cinestaan Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
ITAT Upholds DCF Share Valuation Because Actual Results Cannot Override Future Projections; Revenue Cannot Question Commercial Wisdom of Investors in Share Premium Cases; ITAT Rejects Section 56(2)(viib) Addition Due to Accepted DCF Valuation Method; ITAT Says Assessing Officer Cannot Substitute Own Share Valuation Without Statutory Power.
The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal against deletion of an addition of Rs.39.98 crore made under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act in relation to share premium receiv...
Author Info
