This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ganganally Mallappa Basavaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2020-21
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Ganganally Mallappa Basavaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Bangalore ITAT Deletes Penalty U/s 271AAC – Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely Because Addition Was Made U/s 68
In a significant ruling, the Bangalore ITAT held that penalty u/s 271AAC is not automatic merely because an addition is made u/s 68 towards unsecured loans. The Tribunal emphasized that penalty proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature and discretionary powers vested with the AO must be exercised judiciously.
The assessee, a civil works contractor engaged in Government contracts, had filed an u...






