Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore

Case Law Details

Case Name
Ganganally Mallappa Basavaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2020-21
Advertisement Ganganally Mallappa Basavaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Bangalore ITAT Deletes Penalty U/s 271AAC – Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely Because Addition Was Made U/s 68 In a significant ruling, the Bangalore ITAT held that penalty u/s 271AAC is not automatic merely because an addition is made u/s 68 towards unsecured loans. The Tribunal emphasized that penalty proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature and discretionary powers vested with the AO must be exercised judiciously. The assessee, a civil works contractor engaged in Government contracts, had filed an u...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,900

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *