Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vinita Nitin Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vinita Nitin Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) No Section 69A Addition Merely Due to Time Gap Between Cash Withdrawal and Redeposit;  Salaried Employee Not Required to Maintain Cash Book for Explaining Cash Deposits;  ITAT Quashes Unexplained Cash Addition as Revenue Failed to Prove Alternate Use of Withdrawals. Summary: In Vinita Nitin Chaudhary Vs ITO, the Delhi ITAT deleted an addition of ₹12.08 lakh made under Section 69A for cash deposits during the demonetization period, holding that the deposits were sufficiently explained through earlier withdrawals from the assessee’s own bank accou...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Grants TDS Credit Despite Employer’s Failure to Deposit Tax with Government ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty as Estimated Addition Cannot Justify Penalty ITAT Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition as AO Failed to Disprove Documentary Evidence TDS Under Section 194J Upheld for Coaching Institute Faculty Bad Debt Deduction Allowed as Effective Write-Off Need Not Close Debtor Account View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930