Corporate Social Responsibility refers to the responsibility of the companies where they integrate social, environmental and ethical concerns into their operations and this creates a positive impact. It goes beyond legal requirements, focusing on sustainability, philanthropy, and ethical labor to enhance brand reputation, boost employee morale, and drive long-term performance. The European Commission defines CSR as enterprises taking responsibility for their societal impacts, emphasizing that businesses must comply with laws, act ethically, and contribute to communities.
While Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is seen as a voluntary goodwill gesture done by the companies in the rest of the world but in India it’s a mandate, On April 1, 2014, India made history by enacting Companies Act 2013, which mandated CSR and India became one of the few countries which saw CSR transition from a philanthropic choice to a statutory mandate. And this mandate does not apply to all the business; it only applies to heavyweights. Under this act companies including foreign firms with offices in India, if they meet the criteria during the preceding financial year they must comply with the following:
Section 135 applies to companies with a net worth of ₹500 crore, turnover of ₹1000 crore, or net profit of ₹5 crore or more during the preceding financial year.
CSR initiatives in India mainly focus on sectors which directly contribute to the social welfare and welfare of the community. All the companies which come under the criteria allocate their CSR funds toward projects such as improving access to education, strengthening healthcare facilities, promoting sanitation and hygiene, and supporting rural development programmes. These initiatives often involve the construction of schools, provision of medical services, installation of sanitation infrastructure, and implementation of livelihood and skill development programmes in rural and semi-urban areas.
While such efforts contribute positively to community development, they also reflect a broader shift in the role of corporations within the development landscape. In several instances, CSR initiatives now perform functions that are traditionally associated with local government institutions. This raises important legal and governance questions regarding accountability, coordination, and the long-term sustainability of such initiatives.
This blog therefore examines how Corporate Social Responsibility under the Companies Act, 2013 has evolved into a parallel mechanism for local development, and analyses the legal, accountability, and effectiveness issues that arise when corporate initiatives intersect with the responsibilities of local governance institutions.
Legal Framework of Corporate Social Responsibility under the Companies Act, 2013
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India is primarily governed by Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, along with the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014. India is one of the first countries in the world to introduce a statutory framework that mandates certain companies to undertake CSR activities. The objective of this framework is to encourage corporations to contribute towards social welfare and sustainable development while conducting their business operations.
Section 135 applies to companies that meet any one of the following financial thresholds during a financial year: a net worth of ₹500 crore or more, a turnover of ₹1000 crore or more, or a net profit of ₹5 crore or more. Companies that fall within these thresholds are required to comply with the CSR provisions laid down under the Act. This provision ensures that companies with significant financial capacity contribute a portion of their profits to social development initiatives.
One of the central requirements under Section 135 is the obligation to spend at least two percent of the average net profits of the company made during the three immediately preceding financial years on CSR activities. The law is designed to ensure that profitable companies allocate a part of their earnings toward activities that benefit society and promote inclusive development. If a company fails to spend the required amount, the Board of Directors must specify the reasons for such failure in its annual report, thereby introducing an element of transparency and accountability.
To oversee CSR initiatives, Section 135 requires the constitution of a CSR Committee of the Board. The committee must consist of at least three directors, including at least one independent director where applicable. The CSR Committee plays an important role in the governance of CSR activities. Its responsibilities include formulating and recommending a CSR policy to the Board, identifying appropriate CSR projects, recommending the amount of expenditure to be incurred, and monitoring the implementation of CSR initiatives undertaken by the company.
The Board of Directors retains the ultimate responsibility for CSR compliance. The Board must approve the CSR policy recommended by the committee, ensure that the company undertakes activities in accordance with the policy, and disclose details of CSR initiatives in the Board’s Report. This disclosure requirement strengthens corporate transparency and allows stakeholders to review the company’s social responsibility efforts.
The scope of permissible CSR activities is outlined in Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013, 2013. The Schedule provides a broad and illustrative list of activities that qualify as CSR. These include promoting education, eradicating hunger and poverty, improving healthcare and sanitation, ensuring environmental sustainability, supporting rural development projects, promoting gender equality, and contributing to disaster relief efforts. The wide scope of Schedule VII allows companies flexibility in designing projects that address various social and developmental needs.
The Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014 further operationalize the CSR framework by prescribing the manner in which CSR activities should be implemented and monitored. The rules allow companies to carry out CSR activities either directly or through registered trusts, societies, or Section 8 companies. They also require companies to disclose information regarding CSR policies, projects, and expenditure in their annual reports.
Together, Section 135, Schedule VII, and the CSR Rules create a structured legal framework that integrates corporate participation into India’s broader development objectives while ensuring transparency and accountability in CSR implementation.
CSR and Local Governance Functions
Corporate Social Responsibility plays a very important role in bridging gaps in local governance in India, mainly in areas where public institutions face financial or administrative constraints. The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments were introduced to strengthen grassroots democracy by empowering local self-government institutions. The 73rd Amendment, enacted in 1992, constitutionalised Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) in rural areas through a three-tier structure consisting of the Gram Panchayat at the village level, Panchayat Samiti at the block level, and Zila Parishad at the district level. Through the 11th Schedule, the Constitution assigns 29 functional areas to Panchayats, including sanitation, education, drinking water, healthcare, and rural infrastructure such as roads and bridges. Similarly, the 74th Constitutional Amendment established a framework for urban local governance by creating Nagar Panchayats, Municipal Councils, and Municipal Corporations. The 12th Schedule outlines 18 functions for these urban bodies, which include public health and sanitation, water supply, urban planning, education, healthcare, fire services, and slum improvement.
In principle, Panchayats and Municipalities are responsible for delivering essential services such as sanitation management, operation of local schools, provision of drinking water, healthcare services, and development of rural and urban infrastructure. However, in practice, many local bodies face resource constraints, limited administrative capacity, and delays in the devolution of funds and functions from state governments, which affects their ability to fully perform these responsibilities. In this context, CSR initiatives under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 frequently fund projects that fall within the same domains as local government functions. Corporations often support activities such as constructing classrooms in government schools, installing community water purification systems or wells in villages, promoting sanitation through toilet construction and hygiene campaigns, organizing healthcare camps in underserved areas, and implementing skill development programmes aimed at improving youth employability. A useful example of CSR contributing to local development can be seen in the initiatives undertaken by Tata Steel through the Tata Steel Rural Development Society (TSRDS). The organisation has implemented several projects in Jharkhand and Odisha focusing on healthcare, education, drinking water access and rural infrastructure. In many villages, these initiatives have supplemented services that are normally expected to be provided by local government institutions, demonstrating how CSR initiatives can operate alongside public development programmes. Through such initiatives, companies sometimes collaborate with Panchayati Raj Institutions and Urban Local Bodies, effectively contributing to the delivery of services that are ordinarily the responsibility of local governments. While these initiatives can accelerate development and address urgent community needs, they also highlight how CSR can operate as a parallel mechanism of service delivery, raising broader questions about the relationship between corporate initiatives and democratic public governance.
Accountability Issues
Corporate Social Responsibility in India suffers from accountability and sustainability gaps, effectively operating as a parallel governance system that evades robust public scrutiny. Reporting under Section 135 focuses on financial outlays (via Form CSR-2) rather than measurable outcomes, allowing companies to meet compliance on paper while delivering limited social value; disclosures are self-reported with little independent verification, which fuels greenwashing and conflict-of-interest risks, especially given the scale of spend (₹34,909 crore in 2023–24). Public oversight is weak CSR data on MCA21 is not meaningfully accessible to affected communities and local voices are routinely sidelined as projects adopt top-down designs that diverge from democratic planning. Corporate priorities frequently favour high-visibility or reputation-boosting interventions over pressing local needs, while regulatory monitoring is passive and standardized impact assessment is uncommon (third-party evaluations are required only for the largest projects). These accountability failings compound serious sustainability problems: CSR investments often stop when corporate funding ends, infrastructure (wells, toilets, buildings) goes unmaintained, and projects remain misaligned with schemes such as the Jal Jeevan Mission due to lack of mandatory integration protocols. Implementation frequently produces “white elephants” schools or clinics without teachers or doctors amplified by short timelines and power imbalances with implementing NGOs. Together, these deficiencies risk institutionalising fragmented, inequitable service delivery unless reforms mandate community participation, enforceable exit and handover plans, and formal convergence with local government systems.
Improving Coordination between Corporations and Local Governments
For CSR in India to function as a genuinely effective development tool rather than a mere compliance requirement, certain reforms are necessary to strengthen coordination, participation, and accountability. One important step would be improving coordination between corporations and local governance institutions such as Panchayati Raj Institutions and Municipalities. Formal partnerships could help ensure that CSR projects align with local development priorities, particularly those reflected in Gram Panchayat Development Plans. Involving representatives from Panchayats or Urban Local Bodies in discussions around CSR initiatives would also promote better planning and long-term ownership of projects. Another key reform is the introduction of meaningful community consultation. Requiring companies to engage with Gram Sabhas or ward committees before implementing CSR projects would allow communities to voice their needs and ensure that projects respond to actual local concerns rather than corporate preferences. Strengthening impact assessment mechanisms is equally important. Although recent rules encourage impact evaluation for large CSR expenditures, expanding third-party assessments to cover more projects would help measure the real social outcomes of CSR initiatives rather than simply tracking financial spending. Clearer guidance from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs could also improve implementation by providing standards for ongoing projects, exit strategies, and coordination with existing government schemes such as rural development or sanitation programmes. Finally, multi-stakeholder partnerships involving corporations, local governments, and civil society organisations could help combine financial resources with administrative capacity and community knowledge. Such collaborations would allow companies to contribute funding while local governments ensure maintenance and integration with public services. Taken together, these reforms could transform CSR from a largely compliance-driven obligation into a more accountable and sustainable mechanism that complements local governance and contributes meaningfully to community development.
Conclusion
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 represents one of the most distinctive regulatory innovations in Indian corporate law. By requiring eligible companies to allocate two percent of their average net profits toward social development activities, the law attempts to integrate corporate participation into broader societal welfare. Through Schedule VII, the legislation identifies areas such as education, healthcare, sanitation, environmental sustainability, and rural development as legitimate avenues for CSR expenditure. In this way, CSR moves beyond voluntary philanthropy and becomes a structured legal responsibility aimed at encouraging corporations to contribute to inclusive development.
Over time, CSR initiatives have become closely connected with local development efforts. Many corporate projects operate in sectors that traditionally fall within the responsibilities of Panchayats and Municipalities under the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments. Companies frequently fund the construction of school buildings, drinking water infrastructure, sanitation facilities, and healthcare services in communities located near their operational areas. In regions where local governments face financial or administrative constraints, such initiatives can help bridge important service gaps and accelerate development outcomes.
However, despite these contributions, several structural concerns remain. CSR reporting tends to focus primarily on financial expenditure rather than measurable social outcomes, which limits transparency and meaningful evaluation. Communities that are meant to benefit from these initiatives are often not adequately involved in project planning, resulting in programmes that may not fully reflect local priorities. In some cases, CSR projects are shaped more by corporate visibility and branding considerations than by long-term community needs. Weak monitoring mechanisms and poor integration with existing government schemes also create sustainability issues, where infrastructure built through CSR funding may deteriorate or remain underutilised once corporate involvement ends.
Addressing these challenges requires a more coordinated and accountable approach to CSR governance. Stronger collaboration with Panchayati Raj Institutions and Urban Local Bodies, mandatory community consultations, and broader use of independent impact assessments could significantly improve project effectiveness. Clearer implementation guidelines from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, along with partnerships involving civil society organisations, may further help ensure that CSR initiatives are properly monitored and sustained over time.
Ultimately, CSR should be understood as a supplementary mechanism that supports, rather than replaces, democratic local governance. When aligned with community priorities and integrated with public development frameworks, CSR has the potential to strengthen India’s decentralised governance system while contributing meaningfully to equitable and sustainable development.
Author Bio
