Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gurusamy Suseela Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gurusamy Suseela Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) The assessee challenged the validity of reassessment for AY 2010-11 on the ground that the notice issued u/s 148 was beyond the statutory time limit. Under section 149, the last date for issuing notice was 31.03.2017 (six years from the end of the relevant assessment year). Although the notice bore the date 31.03.2017, the assessee produced evidence showing that it was actually dispatched later, including the speed-post envelope showing dispatch on 03.04.2017. The assessee therefore argued that the notice was ante-dated and issued after the limitation per...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031