Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : P. Suresh Vs D. Kalaivani & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
P. Suresh Vs D. Kalaivani & Ors. (Supreme Court of India) Article 227 Cannot Be Used to Strike Off Plaint When CPC Remedy Exists — SC Restores Suit The Supreme Court of India has emphatically held that High Courts cannot invoke supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution to strike off or reject a plaint when a specific statutory remedy under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is available, particularly Order VII Rule 11 CPC. In the present case, the Madras High Court, exercising powers u/Art.227, had struck off the plaint in a suit for permanent injunction on the ground...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty for VSI Contribution & Section 244A Interest Skill Development Institution Qualifies as ‘Education’; Section 12AA/12AB Registration Restored: Pune ITAT Only Profit Element Taxable for Transport Booking Agent; Income Restricted to 3%: Pune ITAT Investor Cannot Be Denied Section 10(35) Exemption for Mutual Fund Violations: Pune ITAT Section 148 Notice Quashed for Vague Reasons & Lack of Supporting Material: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031