Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Spa constructions Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Spa constructions Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad: Capital Introduced by Partners Not Taxable in Firm—If at All Taxable, It Must Be Assessed in the Partner’s Hands The Tribunal examined the addition of Rs.3,26,91,139/- under section 69A r.w.s. 115BBE made on account of “capital introduced by partners.” Upon evaluating the registered sale deeds, partners’ capital accounts, and bank statements, it was found that substantial payments towards purchase of land from Smt. D. Poojitha were directly made by the partners and duly credited through journal entries, rendering the AO’s fa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930