This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Unexplained Partner Capital Cannot Be Added to Firm’s Income: ITAT Hyderabad
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Spa constructions Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Spa constructions Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
ITAT Hyderabad: Capital Introduced by Partners Not Taxable in Firm—If at All Taxable, It Must Be Assessed in the Partner’s Hands
The Tribunal examined the addition of Rs.3,26,91,139/- under section 69A r.w.s. 115BBE made on account of “capital introduced by partners.” Upon evaluating the registered sale deeds, partners’ capital accounts, and bank statements, it was found that substantial payments towards purchase of land from Smt. D. Poojitha were directly made by the partners and duly credited through journal entries, rendering the AO’s fa...






