The Supreme Court disposes of tax petitions against Sodexo India, citing its precedent in the Rajeev Bansal case. Assessing officers must now apply the law as per the ruling.
Calcutta High Court overturns Usha Martin Telematics tax order for 2019-20, citing a violation of natural justice after a personal hearing was denied.
The NCLAT has set aside a Section 7 insolvency proceeding after the Corporate Debtor repaid the full pending amount, ruling that such proceedings are not valid once the debt is settled.
NCLT Mumbai admitted CIRP application filed u/s. 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code by operational creditor [Unisafe Fire Protection Specialists India Pvt. Ltd.] against Corporate Debtor [Digizone Technology Private Limited] since application is complete and default is proved.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted bail to Anoop alias Anup, accused in a digital arrest scam, noting his over six months of pre-trial custody.
Under Section 153C, the six-year limitation period for issuing a notice to a person other than the one searched begins from the date on which the documents or materials were received by AO, not from the date of the search or notice.
The ITAT Delhi quashed a CIT(A) order passed against a deceased taxpayer, ruling it a nullity. The case was remanded to be decided in the name of the legal heir.
The ITAT Delhi has quashed a reassessment order for Aggarwal Abhushan Private Limited, ruling that the initial notice under Section 148 was issued after the legal
Delhi ITAT rules in favor of a retired railway employee, deleting a Rs15.35 lakh addition under section 69A. The court found the cash deposits were explained by prior withdrawals.
Revenue argued that since assessee was an “eligible assessee” under section 144C(15), AO rightly passed the order and the final order was valid within the time limit of section 153(4). On appeal.
