M/s. R.K. Cylinders Vs Commissioner Of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) Going by the activity undertaken by the appellants as per the tender agreement, it is seen that he is not covered under (i) as above. Moreover, he is not a manufacturer of cylinders or he is not any person authorized by a manufacturer. It is […]
As per section 10B for an undertaking to be eligible as 100% Export Oriented Undertaking, it should fulfill the following conditions: i) The undertaking must have approved by the Development Commissioner ii) The approval so granted by the Development Commissioner should be subsequently ratified by the Board of Approval for Export Oriented Unit (EOU) Scheme.
Hindustan Aeronaurics Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore) It is evident by the submissions of the appellant that the impugned part is not only a mere sting or wire or rope but is part of A90B100 which consists of other units. It was not correct on the part of the department to isolate a minor part […]
M/s. Modern Insecticides Limited Vs State Of Punjab And Others (Punjab and Haryana High Court) Section 129(1)(c) of the Act provides that goods can be released on furnishing of security as prescribed. Section 129(2) of the Act provides for application of Section 67(6) of the Act, which in turn has been referred to in Rule […]
UB Ostan (India) Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) It is clearly evident that an appeal u/s 253 to the Tribunal is required to be filed in prescribed Form No. 36 and the same is to be signed by the persons specified in Sub-rule (2) of Rule 45. As per Sub-rule (2) of Rule 45, […]
Joy Beauty Care (P) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) Ld. CIT(A) had accepted that the gains on sale of shares through Portfolio Management Services (PMS) providers to be taxed under the head capital gains. Against these findings of the Ld. CIT(A), the revenue has not preferred the appeal before us as per the material available […]
CIT Vs Pooja Agarwal (Rajasthan High Court) One of the main reasons for not accepting the genuineness of the transactions declared by the appellant that at the time of survey the appellant in his statement denied having made any transactions in shares. However, subsequently the facts came on record that the appellant had transacted not […]
XLHealth Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. Vs UOI (Karnataka High Court) The total callous, negligent and disrespectful behaviour shown by the Departmental authorities in this Court should not be tolerated at all. It is this kind of lack of judicial discipline which if it goes unpunished, will lead to more litigation and chaos and such public […]
In re NHPC Limited (GST AAR Uttarakhand) Q1. Whether NHPC Limited required to pay GST under reverse charge of Notification No. 13/2017 while making payment to PWD, Uttrakhand for construction of road? A1. No GST is applicable on the activity of the applicant since the same falls under exempted services in terms of Notification No. […]
In re Kundan Misthan Bhandar (GST AAR Uttarakhand) (a) whether supply of pure food items such as sweetmeats, namkeens, cold drink and other edible items from a sweetshop which also runs a restaurant is a transaction of supply of goods or a supply of service? The supply shall be treated as supply of service and […]
