Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Vivekananda Vidyamandir and Others (Supreme Court) Basic wage, would not ipsofacto take within its ambit the salary breakup structure to hold it liable for provident fund deductions when it was paid as special incentive or production bonus given to more meritorious workmen who put in extra output which has a […]
The court ordered the refund due for AY 1993-94 and 1995-96 to be granted to the assessee along with appropriate interest and also ordered a sum of INR 1.50 Lakhs to be paid to the assessee on account of inefficiency and lapse on the part of the department.
Shri Ashok Khatri Vs M/s S3 Infra Reality Pvt Ltd (NAA) From the documents placed on record and the DGAP’s report it is evident that the Respondent has sold 780 units out of 816 residential units, out of which for 29 units there was no consideration paid after introduction of GST, hence the profiteered amount […]
Assessee submitted that they have not received any carbon credit during the year under consideration i.e. AY 2012-13. Assessee submitted that addition made by AO on account of non-existence income ought to be deleted.
Sandeep Goyal Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in Criminal Complaint No.35/2018 for offence under Sections 132(1)(b)(c)(d)(f)(i) & (i) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 read with Section 132(1), (i) & (iv) of Central Goods […]
The assessee has duly discharged its initial onus by submitting sufficient proof substantiating purchase and the payment is also routed through banking channel, simply because of non-existence of parties at the given address, the transaction cannot be treated as bogus and no addition can be made accordingly.
The adjudicating authority has rejected the appellant’s claim of it having made the refund claim on 27.06.2017. The first appellate authority has also concluded the date of filing of the refund claim was 12.07.2017 only as against which the appellant contends that there was an attempt to file the refund claim on 27.06.2017
In view of section 92CA(4) as substituted by Finance Act, 2007 w.e.f. 1-6-2007, AO was bound by the order passed by TPO as he is required to compute total income in conformity with the ALP determined by TPO.
In re Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) Whether grant of Development rights in the current situation would attract the Levy of GST? If liable, what shall be valuation modus Operandi to tax in GST? Notification 4/2018-CGST(Rate), dated 25.01.2018 notified that the liability to pay tax in case of transfer of development rights in […]
In re Orient Press Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Questions:- 1. Whether supply of service of : (i) Printing of Pre-examination items like question papers, OMR sheets (Optical Mark Reading), answer booklets; (ii) Printing of Post-examination items like marks card, grade card, certificates to the educational boards of up to higher secondary; and (iii) What would […]
