ITAT Delhi held that mere Whatsapp messages showing demand do not justify Section 69A additions unless actual receipt of money is proved.
The Supreme Court ruled that leasing residential premises for hostels qualifies as renting for residence. GST exemption applies where the end-use is residential, even through intermediaries.
The Court held that presumptions under Sections 132(4A) and 292C of the Income Tax Act apply only to income-tax proceedings. GST authorities must independently assess evidence without borrowing statutory presumptions from another law.
The representation points to widespread taxpayer hardship due to late ITR utilities and faulty AIS-driven mismatch alerts. KSCAA stressed that technology-led compliance must remain facilitative, not coercive.
This case analysis explains why loose papers are not treated as books of account. Tax liability cannot arise solely from unverified jottings lacking linkage to real transactions.
The representation seeks more time to file GST annual returns citing extensive amendments and late clarifications. It urges an extension to avoid errors arising from systemic and transitional constraints.
The High Court quashed reassessment notices holding that mere receipt of dividends and capital loss does not establish sham transactions. Allegations against fund managers cannot automatically implicate investors.
The statutory regulator declined disclosure of a key committee report on foreign lawyers. The decision raises questions on transparency in policy-making affecting the legal profession.
The order reiterates that acknowledgment of default or suo-motu disclosure does not exempt companies from penalties for statutory non-compliance.
The assessee claimed the firm had dissolved and deposits belonged to a partner. The Tribunal held that absence of documentary proof justified treating bank deposits as unexplained income.
