Case Law Details
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Introduction: In a recent decision, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Mumbai ruled in favor of Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., stating that the company was entitled to a refund, and the concept of “unjust enrichment” did not apply in this case. The matter revolved around whether the authorities were justified in crediting the refund claim to the Consumer Welfare Fund, even after granting the refund.
Detailed Analysis: The case began with Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. (HCCBL), a company engaged in the manufacture of mineral water and aerated water, facing an issue related to the disposal of scrap and damaged goods. The company sold its finished products in glass bottles and crates, and during handling and transportation, some of these items were damaged. To resolve this, HCCBL disposed of the damaged bottles and crates, as well as the empty packaging materials in plastic containers and bags.
The trouble started when the tax authorities claimed that duty was payable on the scrap cleared from the factory. Following their directive, HCCBL started clearing waste and scrap while paying excise duty. However, the company later realized that the scrap was not subject to excise duty as it was a residual material generated during handling, unrelated to manufacturing activity. In 2003, the tribunal ruled in favor of HCCBL, stating that excise duty was not applicable to the scrap generated during handling.
Subsequently, HCCBL filed a refund claim for the duty paid under protest, specifically for the period between February 2000 and December 2001, totaling Rs. 6,02,400. The refund was granted by the adjudicating authority. However, the authorities credited the refund to the Consumer Welfare Fund Account, citing the doctrine of unjust enrichment.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
