Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai remanded the case to examine whether Section 56(2)(x) applied based on the agreement date and to consider refund of ex...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata condoned appeal delay, set aside the CIT(A)'s order, and remanded the assessment for fresh adjudication after grantin...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that a 50-year lease is not a transfer under Section 2(47)(vi) where the transaction is only a lease and not an a...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad allowed Section 10(10B) exemption on BSNL VRS compensation, following coordinate bench rulings despite no claim in ...
Income Tax : ITAT held an assessment passed after the taxpayer's death was invalid in law, quashed the order, and treated all remaining issues ...
ITAT Nagpur held that deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act admissible in case of interest earned from fixed deposit with bank. Accordingly, deduction claimed by the assessee is allowed by deleting the addition.
The ITAT Delhi sets aside over ₹1112 Cr in tax additions in Enormous Nivesh Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT, ruling that Section 56(2)(viia) applies only to the ‘transfer’ of shares, not the ‘fresh allotment’ (issue) of shares, which is governed by Section 56(2)(viib).
ITAT Ahmedabad ruled that reopening an assessment u/s 147 is invalid if based on general, unverified portal information lacking a “live link” to the assessee’s escaped income. Case dismissed.
ITAT Lucknow held that claim has been allowed by AO in scrutiny proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Act, it was natural that the demand raised on the same issue under section 143(1)(a) of the Act is required to be modified. Accordingly, appeal partly allowed.
ITAT quashes DCIT’s 153C assessments for Piyush Bongirwar, holding that a single diary page pertaining only to AY 2013-14 cannot justify assessment for later years without specific incriminating material.
Mumbai ITAT sets aside CIT(A) remand for LTIMindtree; holds AO’s S144 mention was clerical, assessment was S143(3). Directs CIT(A) to decide TP issue on merits.
Agra ITAT confirms deletion of Rs. 6.77 Cr addition u/s 68, ruling the scrap trader’s bank credits were fully explained by GST, loans, VAT refund, and internal transfers, backed by evidence.
Bangalore ITAT restored a case involving Rs.1.49 crore in unexplained cash deposits for fresh assessment, directing the AO to re-examine the source and the CIT(A)’s application of the peak credit method.
A summary of ITAT Chennai’s order in Shanmugasundaram Venkatachalapathy Vs ITO, which sustained both unexplained investment under Section 69 and professional receipts found via Form 26AS but not declared in income tax return.
Chennai ITAT rules Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) is a company tax and not covered by DTAA, rejecting the refund claim. Separately, it capped the TDS disallowance at 30% under Section 40(a)(ia).
