Income Tax : Understand Sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D of the Income Tax Act covering interest on late filing, short payment, delayed adva...
Income Tax : Understand how interest under the Income Tax Act is calculated, including Sections 234A–234D, 244A, and Rule 119A mechanics for ...
Income Tax : Due to any reason, in case the income tax department makes an excess refund to the taxpayer. Such taxpayer will have to return the...
Income Tax : Section 234D in Income Tax Act, 1961 was introduced in the act to cover those situations where the refund was issued to the assess...
Income Tax : The Mumbai ITAT held that reassessment initiated beyond three years was invalid because the alleged escaped income was only ₹5 l...
Income Tax : The Mumbai ITAT found that the assessment order was passed without granting a reasonable opportunity to the assessee to furnish co...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that AY 2010-11 was outside the permissible ten-year assessment block computable under Section 153A. Applying th...
Income Tax : Assessments arising from searches conducted after 01.04.2021 must strictly comply with the reassessment framework under sections 1...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that leave encashment of ₹20.29 lakh received on retirement qualified for exemption as it was within the revised ...
ITAT Delhi held that subscription, professional and training services rendered by the assessee do not fall within the definition of FTS under India-Netherland DTAA and, therefore, cannot be taxed in India.
ITAT Mumbai held that revision under section 263 of the Income Tax Act unjustified as AO while allowing the exemption in the order passed under section 144 r.w.s.263 has taken a possible view upon verifying the details available on record.
ITAT Hyderabad held that assessee being a film artist, physical fitness is a part and parcel of his profession, but it cannot be held to be incurred wholly and exclusively for the profession of the assessee. Hence, disallowance of physical fitness expenditure justifiable in law.
Read ITAT Delhi’s order on Rajiv Ghai vs. ACIT case. Deduction under section 54F allowed for house registered in parents’ name. Detailed analysis and conclusion.
Read ITAT Mumbai order setting property allotment date as acquisition date for capital gain computation. Details of D.K. Brothers vs. ITO case and implications.
ITAT Delhi rules addition u/s 69A for excess jewelry during a search operation unsustainable as the assessee belonged to a wealthy family and received jewelry on occasions
In a recent case, ITAT Kolkata ruled that TDS on rent reimbursement is not deductible if there is no lessor and lessee relationship, siding with McNally Bharat Infrastructure.
ITAT Delhi held that once long term capital gain along with cost of acquisition and indexation accepted in the hands of one of the co-owner of the property, the same needs to be allowed/ accepted for other co-owner of the property too.
ITAT Mumbai held that rate of tax in case of foreign company is higher than rate of tax in case of domestic company and as per the Explanation in the Section 90, inserted in the IT Act with retrospective effect from 01-04-1962 the should not be regarded as violation of nondiscrimination clause.
ITAT Delhi held that receipts from background screening provided by the assessee to its customers in India cannot be regarded as Royalty or Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA and hence not taxable in India.
