Income Tax : The Income Tax Department explains when interest is payable for delayed return filing, advance tax defaults, deferment of instalme...
Income Tax : Understand how interest under the Income Tax Act is calculated, including Sections 234A–234D, 244A, and Rule 119A mechanics for ...
Income Tax : Due to any reason, in case the income tax department makes an excess refund to the taxpayer. Such taxpayer will have to return the...
Income Tax : Section 234D in Income Tax Act, 1961 was introduced in the act to cover those situations where the refund was issued to the assess...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi upheld deletion of the TP adjustment for a debt-free branch, partly allowed the Revenue's appeal on Section 234D, and d...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot quashed Section 147 reassessment as alleged escaped income of Rs. 34.30 lakh was below the Rs. 50 lakh threshold under...
Income Tax : ITAT held interest from head office and overseas branches is not taxable as payment to self, while interest from overseas banks al...
Income Tax : Transfer pricing principles dictate that a captive, risk-mitigated service provider could not be benchmarked against full-fledged,...
Income Tax : The ITAT Ahmedabad held that royalty payments should continue to be benchmarked under TNMM by following earlier decisions in the a...
ITAT held that agreement to sell coupled with possession constituted a valid transfer for the purposes of claiming deduction under Section 54.
Delhi High Court held that the receipts from Indian customers for services provided outside Indian Territory, in connection with use or right to use of process or equipment by the assessee company, cannot be taxed as royalty as per section 9(l)(vi) of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court judgment on GE Capital vs. DCIT, distinguishing under-reporting and misreporting as separate offenses, resulting in quashed penalty. Full text analysis.
ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Anurag Chandra, validating the method of declaring foreign profit after currency conversion. Addition deleted in appeal. Learn more.
In the case of Salesforce.com Singapore Pte Ltd. vs ACIT, ITAT Delhi ruled that receipts from CRM services aren’t taxable in India as royalty or FTS under the Income-tax Act or India-Singapore DTAA.
Ahmedabad ITAT’s order in Atul Limited vs DCIT case discusses TP adjustments, volume discount, geography adjustments, and more. Detailed analysis provided.
Tribunal allowed a claim of Rs. 49.5 crore in the interest of Principle of Natural Justice after finding that the respective authorities failed to appreciate the amended provision of Section 36(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, resulting in the denial of an additional depreciation claim.
ITAT Mumbai rules that comparables cannot be excluded if their financial data can be reasonably extrapolated, in Syngenta Services Private Limited’s case.
ITAT Delhi held that subscription, professional and training services rendered by the assessee do not fall within the definition of FTS under India-Netherland DTAA and, therefore, cannot be taxed in India.
ITAT Mumbai held that revision under section 263 of the Income Tax Act unjustified as AO while allowing the exemption in the order passed under section 144 r.w.s.263 has taken a possible view upon verifying the details available on record.
