Income Tax : Section 145(3) allows rejection of books if accounts are unreliable or standards are not followed. The key takeaway is that specif...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits cannot be treated as unexplained income unless books of account are formally rejected under s...
Income Tax : Learn about various types of income tax assessments under Sections 143, 144, and 147, their procedures, time limits, and taxpayer ...
Income Tax : Summary of statutory deadlines for issuing income tax notices (Sec 143, 147) and completing assessments, reassessments, and appeal...
Income Tax : Understand the three core processes of Indian Income Tax: Rectification of mistakes (Sec 154), the four types of Assessment (Summa...
Income Tax : Starting October 1, 2024, Commissioners (Appeals) will gain new powers to set aside and refer best judgment assessments back to As...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad holds 12.5% profit estimation on ₹2.52 crore bank credits excessive; rejects commission agent claim due to lack o...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad holds that Section 249(4)(b) cannot bar appeal where no income is admitted and no advance tax is payable; sets asid...
Income Tax : The Tribunal restored the case as the CIT(A) confirmed additions without granting adequate opportunity of hearing. It held that fa...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that cash deposits cannot be treated as unexplained when sufficient recorded cash receipts exist. Once books sup...
Income Tax : The High Court quashed assessment and penalty orders after finding notices were sent to an incorrect email address. It held that i...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
During the year, assessee has entered into several international transactions as per Form 3CEB and after analyzing the transactions under consideration. By relying on various decisions, TPO has rejected the submissions of the assessee.
ITAT Surat confirms ₹4.10 Cr addition u/s 69 for unexplained investment, upholds authority to dismiss cases for non-compliance.
ITAT Chennai restricts income addition to 25% of unexplained cash deposit, as assessee failed to establish source of funds during demonetization.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands Rs. 18.47 Cr addition for fresh adjudication, citing invalid assessment order issued in the name of a deceased person.
ITAT Ahmedabad sets aside CIT(A) order, emphasizing that genuine explanations for delays in filing appeals for high-value tax disputes must be considered.
ITAT Delhi held that mere confession of accused cannot be a ground for conviction since the same is not supported by credible evidence on records. Accordingly, addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act deleted.
ITAT Cochin deletes penalty under Section 271B for delayed tax audit, citing the demise of the managing partner as a reasonable cause and following Kerala HC precedent.
Patna High Court held that reassessment proceedings initiated on the basis of incorrect information which was not supported by any material is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, order passed thereon is liable to be quashed.
ITAT Panaji remands case of Salim Ali Darugar vs. ITO concerning addition under Section 69A for unexplained demonetization cash deposits.
Tribunal also took note of the fact that AO had merely reproduced identical reasons for multiple years without verifying facts or forming a belief based on individual year-specific material.
