Income Tax : The issue was whether exempt dividend income could be taxed by overriding Rule 8D. The ITAT held that additions beyond the Section...
Income Tax : Tribunal confirms that detailed AO dissatisfaction justifies invoking Rule 8D, ensuring proper disallowance of expenses related to...
Income Tax : Clarification in respect of disallowance under section 14A in absence of any exempt income during an assessment year Section 14A o...
Income Tax : The issue before the Hon’ble Supreme Court (SC) was whether section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) enables the Depart...
Income Tax : The ever debatable ‘Disallowance under section 14A’ (read with Rule 8D (2) now has again found a different horizon whe...
Income Tax : The mechanical disallowance u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D is also being added to the book profit by the AO irrespective of the fact whethe...
Income Tax : As earlier intimated to you, Writ Petition bearing No. 50 of 2010 (Indian Exporters Grievances Forum & Other vs. CIT) challenging ...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court upheld the deletion of Section 14A disallowance after finding that the Assessing Officer did not record dissatis...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that disallowance under Section 14A cannot be made when the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi ruled that disallowance under Section 14A cannot be made without AO recording satisfaction under Section 14A(2), fully ...
Income Tax : The ITAT found that Rule 8D cannot be applied blindly without examining the nature of investments and income earned. The matter wa...
Income Tax : he ITAT ruled that an automatic ₹56 lakh 14A disallowance was invalid as the AO failed to record specific satisfaction regarding...
Income Tax : Circular No. 5/2014-Income Tax Central Board of Direct Taxes, in exercise of its powers under section 119 of the Act hereby clari...
Income Tax : INCOME TAX NOTIFICATION NO-45/2008, DT: March 24, 2008 Method for determining amount of expenditure in relation to income not incl...
ITAT Mumbai rules no disallowance under Section 14A for investments not yielding tax-free income. Detailed analysis of DCIT vs Paranjapee Schemes case.
In the case of DCIT vs. Paranjapee Schemes Construction Ltd., ITAT Mumbai rules no disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act is warranted for investments not yielding tax-free income.
Explore the ITAT Ahmedabad ruling on Intas Pharmaceuticals Vs ACIT, focusing on working capital adjustment and notional interest on trade receivables.
Dive into the detailed analysis of Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port’s case against DCIT at ITAT Kolkata regarding Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. Understand why cessation of trading liability cannot be invoked without liability in books.
Ahmedabad ITAT’s order in Atul Limited vs DCIT case discusses TP adjustments, volume discount, geography adjustments, and more. Detailed analysis provided.
In a detailed analysis of Axis Bank Limited Vs ACIT case, Ahmedabad ITAT explains the difference between a Letter of Credit and Corporate Guarantee, resolving disallowance disputes.
In the case of Krishnamurthy Thiagarajan vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai), AO’s failure to record dissatisfaction u/s 14A led to ITAT allowing expenditure claim under Section 14A related to earning exempt income.
ITAT Mumbai grants relief to Tata Steel Limited, allowing deduction of interest paid on Perpetual Non-Convertible Debentures (PNCD) under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act.
Bombay High Court ruling: Assessing Officer (AO) must record dissatisfaction with Assessee’s claim regarding expenditure. Detailed analysis of PCIT-2 Vs Tata Capital Ltd case.
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance made u/s. 14A of the Income Tax Act read with rule 8D deleted as tax free funds were more than investment made on which exempt income was earned.
