Clarification in respect of disallowance under section 14A in absence of any exempt income during an assessment year
Section 14A of the Act provides that no deduction shall be allowed in respect of expenditure incurred by the assessee in relation to income that does not form part of the total income as per the provisions of the Act (exempt income).
2. Over the years, disputes have arisen in respect of the issue whether disallowance under section 14A of the Act can be made in cases where no exempt income has accrued, arisen or received by the assessee during an assessment year.
3. CBDT issued Circular No. 5/2014, dated 11/02/2014, clarifying that Rule 8D read with section 14A of the Act provides for disallowance of the expenditure even where tax payer in a particular year has not earned any exempt income. However, still some courts have taken a view that if there is no exempt income during a year, no disallowance under section 14A of the Act can be made for that year. Such an interpretation is not in line with the intention of the legislature. To illustrate, if during a previous year, an assessee incurs an expense of ₹1 lakh to earn non-exempt income of ₹1.5 lakh and also incurs an expense of ₹20,000/- to earn exempt income which may or may not have accrued/received during the year. By holding that provisions of section 14A of the Act does not apply in this year as the exempt income was not accrued/received during the year, it amounts to holding that ₹20,000/- would be allowed as deduction against non-exempt income of ₹1.5 Lakh even though this expense was not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of earning nonexempt income. Such an interpretation defeats the legislative intent of both section 14A as well as section 37 of the Act.
4. In order to make the intention of the legislation clear and to make it free from any misinterpretation, it is proposed to insert an Explanation to section 14A of the Act to clarify that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Act, the provisions of this section shall apply and shall be deemed to have always applied in a case where exempt income has not accrued or arisen or has not been received during the previous year relevant to an assessment year and the expenditure has been incurred during the said previous year in relation to such exempt income.
5. This amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2022.
6. It is also proposed to amend sub-section (1) of the said section, so as to include a non-obstante clause in respect of other provisions of the Income-tax Act and provide that no deduction shall be allowed in relation to exempt income, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Act.
7. This amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2022 and will accordingly apply in relation to the assessment year 2022-23 and subsequent assessment years.
*****
Note on Clauses 9 of Finance Bill 2022
Clause 9 seeks to amend section 14A of the Income-tax Act relating to expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in total income.
The said section, inter-alia, provides that no deduction shall be allowed in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under the Income-tax Act.
It is proposed to amend sub-section (1) of the said section to provide that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Act, for the purpose of computing the total income, no deduction shall be allowable in respect of expenditure incurred in relation to income which does not form part of the total income.
This amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2022 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2022-2023 and subsequent assessment years.
It is also proposed to insert an Explanation to the said section to clarify that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Act, the provisions of the said section shall apply and shall be deemed to have been always applied in a case where the income, not forming part of the total income, has not accrued or arisen or has not been received during the previous year relevant to an assessment year and the expenditure has been incurred during the said previous year in relation to such income not form part of the total income.
This amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2022.
*****
Extract of Clause 9 of Finance Bill 2022
9. Amendment of section 14A.
In section 14A of the Income-tax Act,––
(a) in sub-section (1), for the words “For the purposes of”, the words “Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Act, for the purposes of” shall be substituted;
(b) after the proviso, the following Explanation shall be inserted, namely:––
“Explanation.––For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Act, the provisions of this section shall apply and shall be deemed to have always applied in a case where the income, not forming part of the total income under this Act, has not accrued or arisen or has not been received during the previous year relevant to an assessment year and the expenditure has been incurred during the said previous year in relation to such income not forming part of the total income.”.
******
RECOMMENDED BUDGET 2022 POSTS
ADDed comment < ?
<To ADD: Caption that reads , – "CLARIFICATION in respect of disallowance under section 14A in absence of any exempt income during an assessment year" Anyone who has some familiarity with the history of the legislation of – sec 14A (rtw Rule 8D ) and the long series of disputes and perpetual ongoing litigation in reference thereto cannot concede even remotely that the scores of subject amendments are of 'clarificatory' nature, in any sense !? For a better appreciation of the stated proposition, refer /study the published Articles on the Topic of sec 14A and the relatable sec 36 (1)(iii), so also the viewpoints shared through the POsts on LInkedin and FAcebook ! courtesy
INSTANT
To go even by a simple reading, it must be more than obvious that sec 14A , if were amended, is sure to add to the already obtaining complicity; that is, having the inevitable consequence of de-simlification, augmenting / multiplying the scope for further litigation !?
More (if ENOUGH is not enough )
Comment is edited by admin