Corporate Law : Supreme Court landmark judgment in Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority vs. Prabhjit Singh Soni clarifies creditor right...
Corporate Law : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings on dissenting creditor rights and set-off claims in insolvency cases. Detailed analysis of ke...
Company Law : Discover how to lift a bank account freeze due to company strike off. Learn the steps under Companies Act, 2013, to restore your b...
Corporate Law : Explore significant legal developments, Supreme Court verdicts, and detailed analyses in the Q4 2023 newsletter. Stay informed on ...
Corporate Law : Explore the vital role of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in protecting employee rights during corporate insolvency, high...
Corporate Law : Discover how the latest revisions in CIRP forms by IBBI aim to reduce the compliance burden on insolvency professionals and stream...
Corporate Law : Join the discussion on MCA's proposed changes to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code rules. Learn how to participate and share your ins...
Corporate Law : Explore the impact of the LLP (Amendment) Act, 2021 on Ease of Doing Business, startup encouragement, and the introduction of Smal...
Corporate Law : Central Bureau of Investigation has arrested an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), National Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai and tw...
Company Law : Over the years, for violations under the Companies Act, 2013 the government had been filing criminal cases as per the provisions o...
Corporate Law : Read the detailed NCLT Chandigarh judgment on Nikhil Khanna's application under Section 7 of IBC against Spaze Towers Pvt Ltd. Ana...
Corporate Law : Read about NCLT's rejection of Mittal Polymers' CIRP application against Suvarna Additives Pvt Ltd due to lack of debt proof and d...
Corporate Law : Read the detailed NCLT Delhi judgment on the case between Asset Reconstruction Company and Harvest Hotels & Services Apartments Pv...
Corporate Law : NCLT Kolkata ruled that breaches in settlement agreements do not qualify as operational debt under Section 5(21) of IBC. Full anal...
Corporate Law : NCLT Chandigarh rules indemnity obligation under guarantee is not an operational debt in the case of Agarwal Foundries vs. POSCO E...
Corporate Law : Read about the case involving Chetan Patel, an Insolvency Professional, with detailed analysis of alleged contraventions and submi...
Corporate Law : IBBI Disciplinary Committee suspends Sanjay Singh, an Insolvency Professional, for irregularities in the e-auction process. Detail...
Company Law : Explore the order dated 03.02.2024 from NCLT Chandigarh transferring all pending cases from Bench 2 to Bench 1. Detailed analysis ...
Corporate Law : Filling up of 05 (Five) posts of Judicial Member and 05 (Five) posts of Technical Members in the National Company Law Tribunal (NC...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs announces the appointment of new Judicial and Technical Members in the National Company Law Trib...
For a PCCIT region where the NCLT bench is not situated in the region, the concerned PCCIT was directed to ensure representation by coordinating with the PCCIT in whose jurisdiction the NCLT bench is located. This assumes importance in view of the fact that in case of many NCLT benches, a single bench covers the territorial jurisdiction of more than one Pr.CCIT region.
9,073 cases are under consideration in NCLT, including 1,630 cases of Merger and Amalgamation; 2,511 cases of insolvency and 4,932 cases under other sections of Companies Act. The Company Law Board (CLB) set up under Companies Act 1956 stands dissolved with the setting up of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). As on 12.03.2018, only one […]
The evolving law in due course is seeing some settlement (not by virtue of Article 142 of the Indian Constitution though), but some imperative issues, still some require settlement, and certain others warrant immediate changes. Briefly discussed below are a few imperative judicial pronouncements.
As we all knows that Central Government notified NCLT Rules, 2016 on 21st of July, 2016 through notification in the official gazette. The provisions specify the professionals i.e., Company Secretaries, Chartered Accountants and Advocates who can practice before the NCLT or NCLAT.
M/S Atv Projects (India) Ltd Vs. Union Of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Under the newly enacted Section 4(b) there are only two classes of persons, namely (i) those persons in whose cases schemes were sanctioned and (ii) those persons in whose cases the schemes were pending. In the former, there are two sub-classes […]
The undersigned is directed to say that by virtue of implementation of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC) 2016 after the repeal of erstwhile Sick Industrial Companies Act (SICA). The necessity to decentralize handling of cases at the level of field formations has been felt as 11 National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) benches having territorial jurisdiction across the country and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at Delhi with pan India jurisdiction have been created under IBC
The present appeals raise two important questions which arise under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the Code). The first question is whether, in relation to an operational debt
Board has decided that request/appeal for restoration of name of the ‘struck off’ company with retrospective date from the date of being ‘struck off’ shall be made by the income-tax department in following situations: i. where proceedings under section 143(3)/144/147/153A/153C/set-aside cases were already in progress; or ii where proceedings under section 143(3}/144/147/153A/153C are contemplated in near future; or
As per section 96 of CA, 2013, every Company (other than OPC) shall hold a general meeting annually (exclusive of any other meeting). But if any default is made in holding the annual general meeting of a Company u/s 96, then the Tribunal (NCLT) shall come into the picture.
The NCLAT held that that in the absence of any provision in IBC, the Limitation Act, 1963 would not be applicable to initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The NCLAT further observed:
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
