Company Law : The case examined whether extending redemption timelines amounts to reissuance. The Tribunal held that extensions within statutory...
Corporate Law : This analysis explains how NCLT continues to respect CoC commercial wisdom but now intervenes when procedures, legality, or fairne...
Corporate Law : RTI inquiry into NCLT/NCLAT reveals member vacancies, lack of consolidated case data, and opaque appointments, highlighting need f...
Corporate Law : The NCLT has ruled that banks can classify accounts as fraudulent during IBC proceedings, clarifying that a moratorium does not sh...
Corporate Law : NCLT rules that the IBC's moratorium applies to all proceedings against a corporate debtor, including quasi-judicial and assessmen...
Company Law : ICSI raised concerns over delays in NCLT hearings affecting corporate restructuring and insolvency matters. It emphasized the need...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the government to set up an NCLT Bench in Pune citing 30,600 pending cases and prolonged insolvency timelines. The ...
Company Law : With insolvency cases taking up to 853 days against the 330-day mandate, concerns over NCLT backlog have intensified. A new bench ...
Corporate Law : From 2022-23 to 2024-25, appeals filed at NCLAT rose steadily, with IBC cases forming the majority, reflecting active engagement i...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Corporate Law : Bank of India Vs Neurostar Hospital Private Limited (NCLT Mumbai) The application was filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and ...
Corporate Law : The issue involved rejection of a delayed claim in bankruptcy proceedings. The Tribunal held that concealment of material facts by...
Corporate Law : The tribunal permitted substitution of original petitioners with a new shareholder after transfer of shares. The key takeaway is t...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Res...
Corporate Law : The Tribunal held that default under the loan agreement existed independently of the arbitral award challenge. It ruled that absen...
Corporate Law : Details of Judicial and Technical Members assigned to NCLT benches across India as per the latest order issued by the Ministry of ...
Corporate Law : Read about the case involving Chetan Patel, an Insolvency Professional, with detailed analysis of alleged contraventions and submi...
Corporate Law : IBBI Disciplinary Committee suspends Sanjay Singh, an Insolvency Professional, for irregularities in the e-auction process. Detail...
Company Law : Explore the order dated 03.02.2024 from NCLT Chandigarh transferring all pending cases from Bench 2 to Bench 1. Detailed analysis ...
Corporate Law : Filling up of 05 (Five) posts of Judicial Member and 05 (Five) posts of Technical Members in the National Company Law Tribunal (NC...
NCLT held that breach of the terms and conditions of payment according to a Settlement Agreement does not come under the purview of the Operational Debt as defined under the IBC, 2016 and it cannot be a ground to trigger CIRP against the Corporate Debtor.
Udit Jain (Sole Proprietor of M/s U.J. Trading Co.) Vs Apace Builders and Contractors Pvt. Ltd (NCLT Delhi) HC held that in application filed under section 9 of IBC, 2016 only the date of filing needs to be considered and not the date of sending the Demand Notice. It is seen that notification of MCA dated […]
Time lines are fixed with a definite purpose & bidding process should conclude at scheduled time. Applicant cannot complain after failing to submit EMD within time.
NCLT Held that suspended board of directors were involved in running the business of corporate debtor in a fraudulent & wrongful manner, therefore, responsible & liable under provision of Section 66 of IBC, 2016
NCLT held that it is the Liquidator who has to take call on what mode of sale is in the best in the interest of maximization of value of assets.
The Resolution Plan of the Successful Resolution Applicant could not be approved as it had breached the waterfall mechanism of payments as given under Section 53 of IBC and selectively favoured certain creditors without according any reason for the same and the Plan ineffectively dealt with the interests of all stakeholders of the Corporate Debtor and was non-compliant of Section 30(2)(e) and Section 30(2)(f) of IBC.
NCLT held that entity issuing ‘Letter of Comfort’ cannot be treated as ‘Corporate Debtor/Corporate Guarantor’ under IBC, 2016
NCLT is a summary court and hence, we cannot venture into a detailed proceeding, the main points in a section 7 petition is to check whether there is a debt and default with the aid of the documents annexed with the pleadings. In the present case, the debt as been converted into equity shares, hence there is no debt at the present.
Without proof of disbursement an amount cannot be claimed as financial debt, as disbursement is a sine qua non for any debt to fall within the ambit of financial debt
Held that once the Liquidator applies to NCLT, to adopt particular mode of sale of movable and immovable assets of the Corporate Debtor, which is approved by NCLT, there is no provision in the IBC that empowers NCLAT to suo motu conduct a judicial review of the said decision.
