Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nikhil Khanna Vs Spaze Towers Private Limited (NCLT Chandigarh)
Appeal Number : CP (IB) 70/CHD/HRY/2022 & IA No. 81/2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/06/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Nikhil Khanna Vs Spaze Towers Private Limited (NCLT Chandigarh)

Speculative investor cannot claim status and benefits of Financial Creditor: NCLT rejects CIRP Application

Nikhil Khanna and 87 other applicants filed a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against Spaze Towers Private Limited (the Respondent), seeking initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The applicants had collectively booked 80 office spaces in the “Spaze Corporate Park” project in Gurgaon, Haryana. They claimed default by the Respondent in payment of assured investment returns as per Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) executed for these bookings.

Legal Proceedings: The Respondent argued that the applicants were speculative investors, not genuine allottees entitled to financial creditor status under the IBC. They contended that since obtaining the Occupation and Completion Certificates, the project was complete, and the lease agreements with a third party discharged their obligations to pay assured returns. They also cited the applicability of Section 10A of the IBC, barring applications for defaults occurring during a specified period.

Key Points of Contention:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031