ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : The ITAT Bangalore held that gains arising from buyback of shares are taxable under Section 46A because the conditions prescribed ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that incomplete WhatsApp chats without proof of completed transactions cannot justify additions under Section 69A...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that penalty under Section 271AAC cannot survive once the underlying Section 153C assessment is quashed. The Tribu...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that electronic evidence seized during search proceedings cannot be relied upon without mandatory certification un...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that where sales are accepted and purchases are supported by invoices and banking transactions, only the profit el...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
Understand the ITAT Chennai ruling on valid claims for Long-Term Capital Gains. Learn the tax implications of property sale, liabilities, and deductions under Section 48.
ITAT Bangalore directed AO that claim in respect of interest on fixed deposits if any is not allowed u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act has to be considered in accordance with law by allowing the expenditure u/s. 57 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai finds the reopening of Allied Engineers’ assessment invalid, ruling the addition of alleged bogus purchases unjustified. Case closed.
ITAT Chennai overturns addition of Rs. 28.57 Lacs for cash deposits by Gouthamchand Jain, ruling the source as valid and directing a reassessment.
ITAT Kolkata remands case of Daroga Family Foundation to reconsider condonation of delay in filing Form-10B due to COVID-19. The delay caused denial of tax exemption.
ITAT Cuttack remands Sitaram Fruits Co. case to AO for fresh review due to non-receipt of notices and disputed cash payments. Appeal partly allowed.
ITAT Nagpur rules no additions in Faiz Zakir Vali case, as no incriminating materials were found during search despite unabated assessment.
ITAT Mumbai directs re-examination of disallowed R&D deductions and non-deduction of TDS issues; appeal allowed for statistical purposes
ITAT Mumbai rules hardship allowance from developers is a capital receipt, not taxable as income. Assessee’s appeal allowed following Bombay High Court ruling.
ITAT Ranchi remands MD Yasin Construction Pvt Ltd’s appeal due to CIT(A)’s non-mentioning of reasons for dismissal, directing a de novo review.