ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored bad debt, TDS/VAT disallowance, Section 80G and Section 270A issues for fresh verification by the Assessin...
Income Tax : ITAT Lucknow restored ad hoc expense disallowance for fresh examination and observed GST and TDS late fee is compensatory in natur...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur deleted a Section 68 addition, holding that genuine share transactions cannot be treated as bogus without evidence lin...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that departmental allocation of appeals cannot deny adjudication of a Section 115BAB claim and restored the matte...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that CIT(A) must first decide the validity of reassessment proceedings before remanding the matter to the Assessi...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Mumbai held that it is the duty imposed on the Assessing Officer to complete the rectification process within six months. Thus, by remanding the matter back to the file of Assessing Officer, it is directed to complete the rectification within one month.
ITAT Surat remands Navsari Modh Vanik Panch’s 80G approval case to CIT(E), Ahmedabad. The trust, registered under 12A/12AB, faces re-evaluation of its charitable status based on recent financial records, specifically religious expenditures
Delhi ITAT rules in Ajay Singh vs. ACIT, quashing reassessment for AY 2012-13. Citing borrowed satisfaction and lack of independent inquiry by AO, the tribunal highlights the need for a direct link between tangible material and belief formation, even on merits.
ITAT Jaipur ruled excess stock found in survey as business income, upholding a change in stock valuation method and deleting addition for making charges.
ITAT Delhi rules Oberoi Motors can set off business losses against income surrendered during survey, citing judicial precedents and CBDT circular on Section 115BBE.
Mumbai ITAT rules excess stock found during survey, when linked to business, is undeclared business income, not unexplained investment, thus avoiding Section 115BBE.
ITAT Indore rules excess gold stock found during search is business income, not unexplained investment, and 115BBE not retrospective.
ITAT Indore rules surrendered excess stock found during survey is business income, not unexplained investment under Section 69B, thus bypassing Section 115BBE higher tax rates.
ITAT Delhi rules in favor of assessee, upholding Section 10(38) LTCG exemption and rejecting ‘penny stock’ allegations due to lack of evidence and procedural flaws.
ITAT Delhi nullifies reassessment and LTCG addition, emphasizing mandatory disposal of taxpayer objections and absence of concrete evidence in ‘penny stock’ allegations.